Charlie Gard: No Agreement Over Where Baby Moved For Final Days — Parents Rights Blog

Charlie Gard: No Agreement Over Where Baby Moved For Final Days Hospital bosses and the parents of terminally-ill Charlie Gard have been unable to reach an agreement about where he will spend his final days. Connie Yates and Chris Gard had asked to be allowed to take their son home to die after ending their […]

via Charlie Gard: No Agreement Over Where Baby Moved For Final Days — Parents Rights Blog

In The High Court Of Justice Family Division: In The Matter Of Charlie Gard — Parents Rights Blog

In The High Court Of Justice Family Division: In The Matter Of Charlie Gard In The High Court Of Justice Family Division FD 17 P OO13 AND FD 17 P 00358 IN THE MATTER OF THE INHERENT JURISDICTION OF THE HIGH COURT AND IN THE MATTER OF S.8 CHILDREN ACT1989 Between Great Ormond Street Hospital […]

via In The High Court Of Justice Family Division: In The Matter Of Charlie Gard — Parents Rights Blog

Britain Rejects Italy’s Offer to Treat Baby EU Court Said Must Die — Parents Rights Blog

Britain Rejects Italy’s Offer to Treat Baby EU Court Said Must Die By BREITBART LONDON 5 July 1017 LONDON (AFP) – Britain’s Foreign Minister Boris Johnson told his Italian counterpart on Wednesday that legal reasons prevented the transfer to Rome of a critically-ill British baby due to be taken off life support. “Minister Boris […]

via Britain Rejects Italy’s Offer to Treat Baby EU Court Said Must Die — Parents Rights Blog

UPDATE On Silva Case – Child Berated By Judge, Threatened With Jail After Refusing to Visit Abusive Father

Source: UPDATE On Silva Case – Child Berated By Judge, Threatened With Jail After Refusing to Visit Abusive Father

Brian Claypool Press Conference for Criminal Investigation of Orange County CPS

The New Mafia: A Family Court Crime Family (video)

http://www.weightiermatter.com/divorce/family-court-racketeering-101-short-video-explains-identify-recover-divorce-industry-racketeering/5184/

Karin Wolf, Plaintiffs against Gerald C. Escala : Request for Judicial Notice on United Nations Commission of Status of Women Report

IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ________________________________________________________________________
Karin Wolf, et al.,
Plaintiffs
-against-
Gerald C. Escala, et al.,
Defendants.
Case no. 2:14-cv-05985

REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE

________________________________________________________________________

PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF CLAIMS

 

Plaintiff Karin Elena Wolf, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 201 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, respectfully requests that the Honorable Court take Judicial Notice of the following adjudicative facts and/or public records in support of Karin Elena Wolf’s Petition for Writ of Mandamus. As grounds therefore, Karin Elena Wolf states as follows: Judicial notice is a means by which adjudicative facts not seriously open to
dispute are established as true without the normal requirement of proof by evidence Dippin’Dots, Inc. v. Frosty Bites Distribution, LLC, 369 F.3d 1197, 1204 (11th Cir. 2004);Fed. R.Evid. 201(a) and (b); see also Fed. R. Evid. 201(a).  Adjudicative facts are facts that are relevant to a determination of the claims presented in a case. Id. One category of adjudicative facts subject to judicial notice includes facts that are “generally known within the territorial jurisdiction of the trial court.” Id. (quoting Fed. R. Evid. 201(b)(1)). Such judicially-noticed facts have been described as being “of breathtaking variety.” Id.(collecting cases). Another category includes facts that can be accurately and readily


2


determined from sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned. Fed. R. Evid.
201(b)(1). A court also may take judicial notice of public records. Universal Express, Inc.v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 177 Fed. Appx. 52, 53 (11th Cir. 2006).


Judicial Notice of appropriate adjudicative facts may be taken at any stage in a proceeding, including at the summary judgment stage. Dippin’ Dots, Inc., 369 F.3d at 1204; Fed. R. Evid. 201(f). Courts have wide discretion to take Judicial Notice of facts. Id.; Fed. R. Evid. 201(c).


Because the following adjudicative facts and/or public records relevant to a determination of the claims presented in this case are generally known within the territorial jurisdiction of this Court and are not subject to reasonable dispute, judicial notice should be taken of them: 1. In its just-released 2016 report, the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women (CSW) recognizes women losing custody as an international form of discrimination against women, i.e. systemic male entitlement. It is now on the international map as a human rights issue. The CSW 2016 report officially recognizes “discrimination against women resulting in the loss of child custody to abusive fathers”. [see attached report, p. 55-56, notably # 7 (c)(f)(g)(i)(j) and (k)].

Plaintiff was included as one of over 150 women whose child custody case was considered by the United Nations here. 2. New Jersey Senate Judiciary Committee hearing held on May 23, 2016 on Gov. Chris Christie’s plan to award tenure to state Superior Court Judge Paul X. Escandon, where several women’s advocacy groups and women came forth to argue against it and testify they were discriminated against by Judge Escandon in New Jersey Family Court. 


3


In addition, Monmouth County Assignment Judge Lisa P. Thorton was caught lying under oath during the hearing. See attached – Custody Rulings Stymie Tenure Nomination While 7 Others Pass, by Michael Booth, New Jersey Law Journal, May 24, 2016. http://www.njlawjournal.com/id=1202758501624/Custody-Rulings-Stymie-TenureNomination-While-7-Others-Pass#ixzz4BOfqZMUx See attached – Christie Monmouth Judge Nominee in Trouble by Bob Jordan, Asbury Park Press May 31, 2016. http://www.app.com/story/news/local/new-jersey/2016/05/27/another-chris-christienominee-trouble/85051050/

Dated: ________________

 

   Respectfully submitted,

_________________________________

Karin Elena Wolf

ACP 2312

P.O. Box 1110

Albany, NY 12201-1110 

 

http://www.goldenlassoblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/JUDICIAL-NOTICE-UN-Report-RICO-PDF.pdf