RICO RACKET: MULTIPLE EMPLOYER BENEFIT PROGRAM IN FAMILY COURT

mafia-family-tree

RICO RACKET:

MULTIPLE EMPLOYER BENEFIT SCHEME IN FAMILY COURT

At least one individual in Texas, if not many more, went to jail for most of his life with an added unsavory charge that he also tried to expose of the lawless criminals with badges in and around his county, in power (some alleged pedophiles and/or contract killers and case steerers straight out of the film, “Deliverance“).  Please show respect and spread this like wildfire on Facebook and social media, as others cannot.  His name was, or was reported, to be Joey G. Dauben, and his crew at Freedom of the Press Group, editor Lisa Fussell.  This was reported in 2011.  This young man had an incredibly bright future and I read that he had become engaged to a young lady from California.

 Before him, Joey G. Dauben (and exposing alleged pedophiles and (contract) killers straight out of the movie, “Deliverance“), there was Houston attorney and IT man, Ed Truncellito (around 1999/2000), who I read they disbarred or on a false “mental” charge, for daring to bring a civil RICO case against the state Bar of Texas (“SBOT”) which also exposed the origins of the no fault divorce racket.

THE RACKET

ARC Chart Below:

Unlawful

Multiple Employer Benefit
Program

(that stole my private property, alternatively, “child,”  before family court)

1. Academy of Special Needs Planners
2. ARC (Non-Profit Corporation)
3. Municipal District
4. Court System

Players

1. Title IV-D (Attorney General)
2. DFPS or child protective services (“CPS”)
3. Judges
4. Bank of America and JP Morgan Bank
5. Psychologists / Home Study Experts
6. Special Needs Attorneys
7. Abusive Parent
8. Our Children
9. Protective Parent
10. Law Enforcement

Process

1. The Court orders Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR)
2. The Special Needs Attorney determines the wealth of the family
3. One of the parent becomes the target of the courts, DFPS, and law enforcement
4. To obtain evidence the Court orders a psychological exam and a home study
5. The Court utilizes the evidence to build an adverse case against one parent
6. The build a stronger case DFPS testifies in Court about the TI’s drugs, abuse, mental instability
7. Judge removes conservatorship rights
8. Special Needs Attorney assumes temporary guardianship using the temporary guardianship form
9. Working in cooperation with DFPS and the ARC program – the children are labelled with special needs
10. A trust fund is established by the Special Needs Attorney vis-a-via the ARC
11. Bank of America and JP Morgan Bank then invests the money or borrow against assets
12. The trust fund is overseen by the municipal districts and the Title IV-D Office

Outcome $$

1. Pooled Trusts
2. Liens
2. Domestic and international 501C corporations
3. Retirement Funds

Advertisements